hutzpaf
Legend
Loyaler
Yes, and the variance is really big, so you have to be prepared for that.
john_entony
feed the Fox
Loyaler
I really enjoy playing Omaha, and I play it much better than Texas Hold'em. My biggest tournament win over the past 8-10 years was in 5-card Omaha. In terms of difficulty, Texas Hold'em is definitely the most challenging. 
roberto51
Visionary
Platinum Level
In my opinion, yes.PLO requires more complex hand-reading and decision-making because you have four hole cards instead of two, and hand equities run much closer together, making post-flop play more challengin
Ivan Basic
Rock Star
Silver Level
there is omaha 5, and 6 cards on 888poker.
From my xp -> If you feel lucky, play with 6 cards.
bremp555
Rock Star
Platinum Level
Yeah, I think PLO definitely feels harder, at least at first. There’s just so much more going on with four cards, more draws, more combos and way more tough spots postflop. It can be crazy how often hands change strength from street to street, but at the same time that’s what makes it fun. Once you start getting used to reading the board textures and thinking in ranges, it becomes super interesting to play.
G
GrannySmit77
Rock Star
Platinum Level
It's Hold'em but with more gamble. Since you get dealt 4 cards, if there are 3 more players in the hand everybody has a chance to make a hand. Aces never hold in this game. Sets get easily cracked by double suite connectors or 2 pairs that boat up. You need a bigger bankroll because you can lose more money faster. I'm just a recreational player, I rarely play because I don't have the bankroll.
K
Kasztor007
Enthusiast
Silver Level
I think PLO definitely feels harder at first. With four cards, the hand equities run much closer together, so postflop play becomes way more complex — every street can completely change the situation. I mostly play Hold’em, but whenever I try PLO, I feel like my brain has to work twice as hard just to read the board right. Still, that chaos is what makes it fun!
Mantinhoo
Rock Star
Platinum Level
Yeah, most players would say PLO is harder than Hold’em. There’s a lot more variance, more possible hand combinations, and it’s easier to make strong but second-best hands that can cost you big pots. It requires deeper understanding of equity and board textures, so while it’s more exciting, it’s definitely more complex strategically.
G
gardenwall
Rock Star
Bronze Level
dreamer13
Legend
Loyaler
Just my opinion, but PLO is a lot more fun than playing a pre-flop fold simulator. For me, PLO requires a lot of thinking, a lot of calculations, and you can play with a higher vpip without being a jerk.In PLO, I feel like something is always happening. It's just much more fun for me.
