General Question:
When I read excerpts of Tommy Angelo's writing it usually says the advice is for
Limit Hold 'Em. How much of this advice is
not applicable to NLHE?
One example:
Suitedness (limit hold'em)
When should suitedness tip the scales between playing a hand and folding it at limit hold'em? In other words, when does the difference between K9s and K9o, or 87s and 87o, or A2s and A2o, make a difference? When I play, I draw the line at the last three seats: the button, cutoff, and hijack. From those positions, the difference between suited and unsuited can be big enough to turn a fold into a raise or call. From the other positions, it never is. I am suit blind before the flop from early position and from the blinds. I see only the number of spots on the cards, not their shape.
My experience has been that this advice often applies to NLHE as well. I.e. Playing KJs from MP but folding KJo until the CO hasn't been great for me. KJs from MP has been a money loser but I have opened with it over and over because the EV charts says that KJs has roughly the same value as 88.
Curious what y'all think about this and whether you take suitedness into account as to whether to open a hand or not?