Who's More dangerous ☢️

Shadow6969

Shadow6969

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Sep 11, 2025
Total posts
286
IN
Chips
226
What's more dangerous: a total fish or a confident bad reg?
 
hardongear

hardongear

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Total posts
1,192
CA
Chips
877
Total fish on a heater in my opinion. That heater is going to come to an end. The confident bad reg will always just be bad as he is confident/has an ego so is very unlikely to change his bad play. While a fish on heater in my opinion would be more open to change when the heater ends and either a friend tries to help by showing him he was just getting lucky(on a heater) or the fish himself reflects a bit and admits he was lucky and seeks to learn to play better on his own.

Cheers!!!
 
C

Cozmin

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Total posts
37
Awards
1
RO
Chips
67
Categorically the one with the most experience, the fish can ruin your whole strategy sometimes, especially as I suffered I go all in su 88 I KK and he gives him 8 on the flop, the next hand I AA le 66 go all in and he gives him 6 on the river or another time I AA and he makes a flush on the river or kinta in the hole that's how I suffered all December
 
tuitui

tuitui

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Total posts
103
FI
Chips
110
Confident bad reg. Total fish is easy to read and pays a lot of money that will end up in my pocket. Only dangerous in lucky incidents. Confident red flag probably would cause more trouble for me. I rather play with fish. 🐟
 
austral

austral

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Sep 24, 2025
Total posts
209
Awards
1
AR
Chips
262
A bad reg forces you to play uncomfortable spots. He doesn’t make big mistakes.
 
W

wushibala

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Jun 23, 2025
Total posts
296
UA
Chips
270
I tend to agree with most of those who have already posted here — I also think that a regular player is more dangerous.
 
RALF_AK

RALF_AK

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Total posts
587
Awards
4
BR
Chips
493
...the correct question would be:
"Considering the long term, which of the above options would remain active in poker?"
Answer: None, because luck is not responsible for a player being profitable in poker.
 
DiazPoker3101

DiazPoker3101

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Total posts
784
Awards
3
AR
Chips
492
Neither one, and both at the same time — you’ve got to be able to adapt to each situation.
 
B

burba

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 9, 2023
Total posts
172
Chips
525
None of them.
Fish lose because they don’t know better.
Confident bad regs lose because they think they know better.

In the short term, the bad reg will cost you more headaches and more EV in misplays. In the long run, you still win vs both—but the fish pays you clean, the bad reg makes you work for it.
 
flattershay

flattershay

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Total posts
944
Awards
16
Chips
71
Whoever has the most luck. Even if you can outplay both of them, the luck will be the deciding factor.
 
V

veszmo

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2024
Total posts
221
HU
Chips
352
The fish reveal themselves with one or two actions, and from then on I like to play against them.
 
Top