Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ChuckTs, post: 779938, member: 467"]
Hi BigHef, and thanks for the quality video.

On to the hand, I think you pretty much analyzed it perfectly.  You do however say that your bet on the turn is 'designed to fold out hands like JT', which is incorrect - the bet is designed to [I]charge [/I]hands like JT.  We want those hands to call since we're making money long-term when they do (if we set a bad price for them).  It may have just been a slip of the tongue, but I'm a nitpicker ;)

I really like the analysis though and the way the hand played out.  By the river we're basically representing AK/AA or even AJh/AQh ourselves, and he might go ahead and either turn a smaller two pair into a bluff, or might value bet a rivered two pair (KQ, QJ etc).  Betting the river doesn't have much value as we're basically representing the straight or at worst a marginally played set that doesn't want to take their foot off the gas pedal, so basically he won't call with any two-pair hands.

About the video: we usually do the videos a little differently here, but I really like the teaching style you used, explaining your thought process street by street.  I'm half asleep and rambling a bit now (am probably making no sense atm...), but just want to say I enjoyed the well made video and I hope to see you stick around and contribute more :)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us