Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6953659, member: 397965"]
Personal experience is valid data, but only if it is based on significant samples. The issue for OP and many others is, they begin to draw conclusions waaay to early, when their results are completely dominated by meaningless short term variance. What I would advice instead, whenever people want to try new games, is to simply pay attention to, if the games are good or not.

There is an old saying "if you cant identify the fish within 1-2 orbits, you are likely the fish". And this is very much true. If you are already an established winning player in some games, and you can see people making big obvious mistakes in a new game, you want to try, then chances are, you are also going to be a winner in that game. And this is true both, when we want to try a new site, when we want to try a new game on the same site, or maybe we just want to move up.

If we cant identify significant mistakes, which other players make on a regular basis, then chances are, we are not going to be able to beat that game. So either we need to move back to games, that are softer. Or we need to study and improve, so we can identify mistakes, that are less obvious, and that maybe we are also making ourselfes, because we do not know any better ;)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us