TeUnit
Legend
Loyaler
Very easily, when you can exploit players -exploit them, when you cant GTO.
This could just be a function of how familiar you are with the players. If you dont know the players and think they may be playing unexploitable - then GTO.
In lower buyins or freerolls, exploitive play is almost always the best way to go.
This could just be a function of how familiar you are with the players. If you dont know the players and think they may be playing unexploitable - then GTO.
In lower buyins or freerolls, exploitive play is almost always the best way to go.
eetenor
Legend
Loyaler
First you need to very clearly define your understanding of GTO- Do you mean solver equilibrium play? Which is what most people think is GTO.
Humans are incapable of replicating GTO play, every time you play poker you are playing exploit poker. Why? Because you are never getting the Villains range 100% correct. There is no way for you to know the frequency that a V uses to take their actions.
The moment you know the frequency is when the V is wildly unbalanced and therefore can be exploited. Think NITS and MANIACS
Whenever we play poker what we are doing always is trying to figure out what mistake types our V are making.
Not the exact mistake frequency but the over arching concepts- They are passive- their bet sizes reflect their hands etc etc
So we use GTO solver charts to set our baseline and adapt based on table dynamics and player pool tendencies.
The famous quote is true "Poker is an easy game to learn but takes a lifetime to master"
Humans are incapable of replicating GTO play, every time you play poker you are playing exploit poker. Why? Because you are never getting the Villains range 100% correct. There is no way for you to know the frequency that a V uses to take their actions.
The moment you know the frequency is when the V is wildly unbalanced and therefore can be exploited. Think NITS and MANIACS
Whenever we play poker what we are doing always is trying to figure out what mistake types our V are making.
Not the exact mistake frequency but the over arching concepts- They are passive- their bet sizes reflect their hands etc etc
So we use GTO solver charts to set our baseline and adapt based on table dynamics and player pool tendencies.
The famous quote is true "Poker is an easy game to learn but takes a lifetime to master"
SpanRmonka
Legend
Loyaler
Assuming you play microstakes.
First massive thing you have to understand, study solver based plays by all means, but you need to understand why the solver is doing what its doing.
A classic example for a microstakes population. Do not bluff as much as the solver may suggest. Players at microstakes are much more likely to call and chase draws or not be able to give up 2nd pair, or top pair weak kicker. So you have to use that info, by not getting yourself in silly bluffing situations.
From that baseline you can see how players at your table are actually playing, and adjust/exploit accordingly.
First massive thing you have to understand, study solver based plays by all means, but you need to understand why the solver is doing what its doing.
A classic example for a microstakes population. Do not bluff as much as the solver may suggest. Players at microstakes are much more likely to call and chase draws or not be able to give up 2nd pair, or top pair weak kicker. So you have to use that info, by not getting yourself in silly bluffing situations.
From that baseline you can see how players at your table are actually playing, and adjust/exploit accordingly.
RocknRoll6356
Rising Star
Bronze Level
I treat GTO as the foundation and exploitative play as the adjustment.
I start with solid, balanced ranges so I’m not making big mistakes by default. Once I spot clear tendencies—overfolding, calling too wide, under-bluffing—I’m happy to deviate and exploit, even if it’s not “GTO-pure.”
At low–mid stakes especially, the money comes from exploiting population leaks, not perfectly balanced lines. GTO keeps me safe; exploits make me money. The key is knowing when to switch and not leveling yourself. ♠️
I start with solid, balanced ranges so I’m not making big mistakes by default. Once I spot clear tendencies—overfolding, calling too wide, under-bluffing—I’m happy to deviate and exploit, even if it’s not “GTO-pure.”
At low–mid stakes especially, the money comes from exploiting population leaks, not perfectly balanced lines. GTO keeps me safe; exploits make me money. The key is knowing when to switch and not leveling yourself. ♠️