Collin Moshman said:
I agree that you should play a wide range in the small blind in unraised pots, but consider limping a lot of these hands instead of raising unless the big blind is tight-passive.
When there's a previous raise, you're right that it's very different and you should tighten up quite a bit relative to the unraised situation. For example, if the button raises and you have 65s, I would usually just be folding. But if it were folded to us, we would almost always play that hand.
If you want to look at any specific small blind hands/situations, feel free to post them here.
many thanks for writing back Collin...
specific hands / situations...?? i think sb play generally isn't so much about specific hands...rather...situations...player behaviour.
One's own holding ( any two) isn't as important as how you think your opponent will (generally) react to your own action according to their previous behaviour patterns.
sure...an open from early position has to be treated very differently to a lead out bet from the button. How often does the button bet when the action is folded to them? What is their fold to a 3-bet frequency??
I play 100/200 and 200/400 nlhe...both 9 and 6 handed...
unless there is a maniac at the table...rare...very often at 6 handed, the button gets a free shot at the blinds. Not so often obviously in 9 handed. Often 6 handed, it is the general 'mood' of the table for the button to bet at the blinds. A 3-bet will quite often scare off the bb, and the button will fold their junk. Sometimes it doesnt work all the time of course..lol.
It boils down to presumed fold percentages...and of course one's own table image...which one has carefully created over the course of time...both at the present table, and in the past...especially if one is playing regs.
Mixing one's own behaviour / actions / range is of course wise...be unpredictable.