Why would detecting a bluff be the only option or the best way to approach the concept of bluffing?
I would rather induce the bluff, by witnessing the player bluffing, that is induced by my deeds in earlier streets or prior hands.
This will then allow others or the same player to then against my actions to expand on how they play.
This when I am holding what they are representing, then after allowing them to continue the line of play, do they have the ability to adjust or play future hands straight forward as the result of prior conflicts?
Then my opportunity increases for my game to naturally play without having cards to produce pots but I am never bluffing.
Then trying to detect bluffing becomes a natural part of my game rather than having to "detect", because just like hands that play themselves; this approach is put upon the abilities of others that will define themselves as the session continues.
It is up to me to read the story, tell a story, which defines their deeds based upon how they approach the situation based on ability of the moment.
Then it becomes do I go one level above or below and in the moment my game will know which level or will come to a conclusion they are not bluffing in-fact by putting them into a conflict prior as I described at the beginning.
Then the question will become did they adjust or are they staying true to being straightforward after being induced to show the nature of what they are?
I do this every day on line, based on my abilities, the abilities of others by knowing how to bring out what their abilities are in the moment.
Or I can do this live, the mental part of this by knowing more than the thinker, either online or live, this will produce a truer sense of what is going on in real time.
Then continue the learning process to advance the necessary abilities to further my edge.