ohshootmybad said:
AA vs AA is virtually 50/50 to tie, not for either one to win. Unless you consider splitting a pot as win, but then, with rake, it's more of a loss than anything. Even if pot was even split and you win a little extra dead money, it's not exactly a win because you didn't beat the other hand, you just tied with it. I don't consider a tie a win.
Consider this: The only way AA > AA is to hit a 4 card flush. All other hands possible combinations are split and neither hand wins.
The odds of either hand flopping 3 of the same suite is 1.2%. If that happens, then that hand has ~35% chance to hit on the turn or river. This is it's best chances of winning, but there is a 98.8% chance that the flop isn't 3 of the same suit.
The odds of flopping a back door flush draw with 2 suits on the board is ~25.6%, but the odds of actually hitting the backdoor flush is 1.26%
AA doesn't beat AA 50% of the time, it splits with each other virtually 50% of the time. The odds of AA > AA is most likely only a ~2% chance for either hand.
very basic maths here
His question is " what is the best hand chance against AA"
so we calcualate Equity in the long run
my answer is AA
so you win 50% lost 50% play
pot size A
equity= 50% A- 50% A=
0
so your answer 78s or 65s whatever
win 25% lost 75% play
pot size A
equity 25% A- 75% A=
Negative 50% A
so you thing best hand against AA is 65s/78s or my answer AA???
if you always play any size pot AAonly vs AA, in the long run, think repeat 1billion hands situation sperately ...or whatever, you lost nothing ,win nothing.- so best chance is no loss. o
if you always use 65s or 78s...hummm.....you know after 1 billion hands ...you lost incredible huge amount LOL
so still thing best hands against AA is 78s???
So best chance is no loss in the long run, or loss a lot you choose LOL
