50 cent power path sit and go 9 high like a not so boss

PokerStars, $0.46 + $0.04 - Hold'em No Limit - 15/30 - 2 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat

SB: 1,015 (34 bb)
BB (Hero): 485 (16 bb)

Pre-Flop: (45) Hero is BB with 8♣ 6♣
SB calls 15, Hero checks

Flop: (60) 8♦ J♣ J♦ (2 players)
Hero checks, SB checks

Turn: (60) J♠ (2 players)
Hero bets 45, SB raises to 90, Hero raises to 455 (all-in), SB calls 365

River: (970) 2♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: 970

Showdown:
BB (Hero) shows 8♣ 6♣ (a full house, Jacks full of Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 32%, Flop: 80%, Turn: 89%, River: 100%)

SB shows 9♣ 6♥ (three of a kind, Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 68%, Flop: 20%, Turn: 11%, River: 0%)

BB (Hero) wins 970

it was a spin and go and not a sit and go. what a call!

I know, its very low buyin, but even so this is pretty insane. The min-raise on turn after checking back flop is kind of goofy, but at least it can be justified as a bluff. But when he then face a 3-bet jam, surely its time to let it go??? Maybe he thought, you were bluffing, but he dont even beat most of your bluffs.

Sunz of Beaches said:

PokerStars, $0.46 + $0.04 - Hold'em No Limit - 15/30 - 2 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat

SB: 1,015 (34 bb)
BB (Hero): 485 (16 bb)

Pre-Flop: (45) Hero is BB with 8♣ 6♣
SB calls 15, Hero checks

Flop: (60) 8♦ J♣ J♦ (2 players)
Hero checks, SB checks

Turn: (60) J♠ (2 players)
Hero bets 45, SB raises to 90, Hero raises to 455 (all-in), SB calls 365

River: (970) 2♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: 970

Showdown:
BB (Hero) shows 8♣ 6♣ (a full house, Jacks full of Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 32%, Flop: 80%, Turn: 89%, River: 100%)

SB shows 9♣ 6♥ (three of a kind, Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 68%, Flop: 20%, Turn: 11%, River: 0%)

BB (Hero) wins 970

Click to expand...

Nice hand and good result 👏
With 16bb effective in a spin & go, I actually like the aggressive line on the turn. Once you improve to a full house, there’s no reason to slow play here, especially against a range that includes trips and weaker made hands.


The check-check flop makes sense, and when the SB raises the turn, jamming is probably the best option given stack sizes. You deny equity and get paid by hands that won’t fold anyway at this level.


Well played overall — sometimes “not so boss” lines still get boss-level results 😄

Nice hand and good result 👏
With 16bb effective in a spin & go, I actually like the aggressive line on the turn. Once you improve to a full house, there’s no reason to slow play here, especially against a range that includes trips and weaker made hands.


The check-check flop makes sense, and when the SB raises the turn, jamming is probably the best option given stack sizes. You deny equity and get paid by hands that won’t fold anyway at this level.


Well played overall — sometimes “not so boss” lines still get boss-level results 😄

fundiver199 said:

I know, its very low buyin, but even so this is pretty insane. The min-raise on turn after checking back flop is kind of goofy, but at least it can be justified as a bluff. But when he then face a 3-bet jam, surely its time to let it go??? Maybe he thought, you were bluffing, but he dont even beat most of your bluffs.

Click to expand...

I thought if i go 3/4 on turn it looks very bluffy after checking the flop and it worked lol. But i i thought he has at least least k high or a low pair after the call. But yeah very low buy-in and crazy stuff happening in those but first time i saw something like that in a long time.

It is called unsuccessfully bluffanul)))

Kpaprince said:

Sometimes “not so boss” lines still get boss-level results 😄

Click to expand...

Hey the other guy is the "not so boss" and not me 😅👍

I think that it was a total soul read theyre nothing u can do about it....