theANMATOR
Legend
Bronze Level
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2019
- Total posts
- 1,250
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
I know the answers to this question are largely dictated by stack sizes, tendencies of the players in the blinds, and a couple other elements of tourney play, including table image, dynamics - and at what point this situation arises in the event, early mid-point, late reg closed etc etc.
BUT - I'd like to get some other players input on this situation, because I kind of feel like I might be playing a bit too tight. Or maybe not - I'm really unsure.
Common belief is we should defend in the BB pretty wide. Personally I think it's better to play slightly wider on the button than to defend oop in the bb, but that's just me.
So the general question - without specifics - is When it's folded to you on the button -- how wide is your opening range.
Lets say we have above average (top 25) stack size in a standard large field online MTT that runs for 12-15 levels, and we are on level 8, and the players in the blinds are straight up ABC players. They are very easy to play against.
Historically - I've been folding here with marginally playable hands, say Q/7 suited, J/9 off, A/8 off, T/8 suited, but having position in this situation is very strong in my view - if we can get to the flop cheaply. And the more often I observe the blind play SB vs BB - it makes me think I'm being too tight in this spot.
I'm not talking here about thinking I have the best hand - I'm really talking about playing poker from this spot. Although against the standard marginally thinking player pool - this might be a bad idea. Better to just play my standard game and let the fish punt off to me. But I've had this niggling feeling for a while now - and wanted some others input on it.
Also - just to be clear to everyone - I play micro stakes - where the general player pool is straight up ABC, the majority of the pool do not fold top pair, they will call down 2 pair on straight and flush boards with regularity, where only about 20% are able to bluff in the right spots, and 5% of those who are able to bluff - are just aggro donks who are over-bluffing consistently.
There are good players at the micro level - not saying there aren't - but it's important to point out the general player pool where I play - when considering answers to this question. Theory strict responses - might be less appropriate in this pool than they would be in mid+ stakes.
Thanks in advance for all who provide insight.
BUT - I'd like to get some other players input on this situation, because I kind of feel like I might be playing a bit too tight. Or maybe not - I'm really unsure.
Common belief is we should defend in the BB pretty wide. Personally I think it's better to play slightly wider on the button than to defend oop in the bb, but that's just me.
So the general question - without specifics - is When it's folded to you on the button -- how wide is your opening range.
Lets say we have above average (top 25) stack size in a standard large field online MTT that runs for 12-15 levels, and we are on level 8, and the players in the blinds are straight up ABC players. They are very easy to play against.
Historically - I've been folding here with marginally playable hands, say Q/7 suited, J/9 off, A/8 off, T/8 suited, but having position in this situation is very strong in my view - if we can get to the flop cheaply. And the more often I observe the blind play SB vs BB - it makes me think I'm being too tight in this spot.
I'm not talking here about thinking I have the best hand - I'm really talking about playing poker from this spot. Although against the standard marginally thinking player pool - this might be a bad idea. Better to just play my standard game and let the fish punt off to me. But I've had this niggling feeling for a while now - and wanted some others input on it.
Also - just to be clear to everyone - I play micro stakes - where the general player pool is straight up ABC, the majority of the pool do not fold top pair, they will call down 2 pair on straight and flush boards with regularity, where only about 20% are able to bluff in the right spots, and 5% of those who are able to bluff - are just aggro donks who are over-bluffing consistently.
There are good players at the micro level - not saying there aren't - but it's important to point out the general player pool where I play - when considering answers to this question. Theory strict responses - might be less appropriate in this pool than they would be in mid+ stakes.
Thanks in advance for all who provide insight.
Last edited:















