Whoever plays by necessity is bound to lose?

[Edison A]

Whoever plays by necessity is bound to lose? Friends are saying? .... differentiates between the player would be playing for fun or entertainment player who plays for need of money?

 

[RunoMont]

Money is a necessity

lots of famous players started playing with the necessity of making money through poker playing. whenever one decides to go Pro, it becomes a necessity. bankroll management should be the subject of discussion instead of the necessity per say.

 

[Edison A]

Poker

Creo el I believe that the theme also applies to real money casino games, I do not think that when playing necessarily you have good results since to play all games you have to be prepared and have the knowledge necessary to enter any game se aplica a los juegos de casino de dinero real, no creo que al jugar n ecesariamente tengas buenos resultados ya que para jugar a todos los juegos tienes que estar preparado y tener el conocimiento necesario para ingresar a cualquier juego que sea necesario para jugar cualquier juego que esté preparado y que tenga el conocimiento necesario para ingresar a cualquier juego.

 

[Willroquefan]

In poker you win or you lose;the necessity of money depends on each player specifically. Somebody just play for fun and there those who plays for necessity.

 

[Moe DeLawn]

I wouldn't say they are bound to lose, but if they are under financial pressure it could affect how they play. When you make a decision at the poker table it should be based on variables like odds/percentages/tells. If you are 'playing with the rent money' as they say, this can affect your decision making process. Although, i've known players who play very well under these circumstances as it seems to keep them more focussed. They are the exception though.

 

[Ryan Laplante]

If you need to win it makes winning incredibly difficult.

This is why bankroll management is soooo important.

 

[r21sp]

the one who needs money will not play poker if he was not a good player before! and if a person decided to learn from scratch from scratch because he does not need money, then this is a bad idea, because from the moment of the beginning and to the first stable profit, years can pass

 

[P86]

some times you have no choice but to play

 

[RunoMont]

poker is a money game

there is no doubt that every money won through a legal activity becomes a profit. Profit a global necessity. in my opinion there are no special person with a necessity. everyone needs money.

 

[Jockerist]

Play for fun. The need of the game will not bring anything good.

 

[vapandrei]

If you need to win it makes winning incredibly difficult.

This is why bankroll management is soooo important.

So true, so true. I sometimes find myself needing to win.. and losing. The frustration afterwards is 10x and your a tilt bomb.

 

[Rvstam]

what does it mean to play if necessary ?? there is a man with a gun attached to your head and says: play poker !!! what a stupid question do not want to not play.

 

[kraemer]

Only gamble with money that You can afford to lose... It's that simple!

Playing to pay your bills is a stupid idea... even if You are a great player. Because in poker You make money in the long run and even the best players have losing streaks so that there is no way to make sure You will actually start earning right away when You start playing...

Someone who is under financial pressure and tries to solve that by going to a poker room is not a poker player... He is a gambling addict!

 

[charlesdenis]

I play poker out of necessity, and I think this makes my decision-making very difficult, I've lost to winning by 5 for holding the game and I expect the 6 to fall, because the difference between the two places was 100 US, and that's good money. I can not wait to build a decent bankroll and not have those fears anymore, and end up holding the game by necessity.

 

[acetalker]

I do not think its the why , i think its the how. Whatever your reason to play, even if that reason is your circumstances in life, winning or losing still depends largely on how you play the game. Of course there's lady luck.

 

[kened2112]

Whoever plays by necessity is bound to lose? Friends are saying? .... differentiates between the player would be playing for fun or entertainment player who plays for need of money?

not necessarily, even many have achieved an economic sustain in poker

 

[kened2112]

what does it mean to play if necessary ?? there is a man with a gun attached to your head and says: play poker !!! what a stupid question do not want to not play.

what he is referring to is that poker is a matter of studies, learning and dedication is not going to be something that you started playing today and won in main event, the thing is that if you are in a hurry to win you will lose

 

[rsimms]

I agree 100%. Playing poker out of necessity puts an unnecessary pressure on yourself, making the decision making process more rushed and stressful. I find when you are forcing a win, you will make undisciplined plays, being overly aggressive in the wrong places, and it makes losing even worse.

 

[damgold]

I think gambling out of necessity causes the person to improve his game trough pressure.

 

[luckybest]

Not necessarily the extra pressure on someone can make them play better and they can actually win more games for being under pressure

 

[oneloy]

but I do not want to play for fun ... I'm better at playing for money ...

 

[belka2203]

When I play to win money, I often lose. I now try to play just right, to make the right decisions in every hand, on every street. When I play like that, I often win.

 

[PapaC]

I play poker for the money because I need the money, and since that's my goal, I have to do whatever it takes to win. Yes I lose, but I win way more than I lose.

 

[Fresher1999]

Why? It all depends on the level of your game.

 

[Ranish625]

I think so too, I how many times playing out of necessity, but have never won, have won only playing for fun