In my opinion, solvers are a mixed bag. Although they certainly help players comprehend the game better and enhance their strategy, there is a chance of becoming overly reliant on them. Many players employ solver results without understanding the reasoning behind them, which can result in monotonous, robotic play that is not flexible in live games or nuanced situations. Although solvers may provide players with a solid foundation, poker is still about reading your opponents and adapting to the games dynamics. Therefore, if players depend too much on solvers without fully comprehending the context, it may hurt their entire game. Maintaining a balance is essential. Solvers are useful tools, but they should be just one part of your overall strategy, not the whole strategy.Solvers are powerful, but sometimes I feel like players misapply them without fully understanding the logic.
Do you think solvers help or harm the average player?