G0930 said:
Just admit that you're biased towards GG xD
I am not biased against GG. I just see the site for, what it is. Unlike others, who seem to think, that just because they have become big, everything they do, must be fantastic. Which is like saying, that the largest drug cartel is fantastic. Or that its great to eat cow manure, because a billion flies do it, and they cant be wrong
G0930 said:
I admit I liked Pokerstars until 5 years ago. They are in steady decline of players
Yes volume on PokerStars is declining. But as long as I can still get all the action, I need, why does that even matter? Because its important to feel, you are on the winning team and follow the latest fashion? Or exactly why?
G0930 said:
and their reward system is a bloody joke.
I dont care much about rewards. They are like feeding a dog with its own tail, and sites are not even allowed to offer them here in Sweden.
G0930 said:
I don't deny that there is potential of fraud at GG but certainly not more than in any other major pokerooms
Yes there is more potential for fraud at GG Poker than at PokerStars because of their lack of transparency and player oversight. Thats not nessesarely a dealbreaker, but it is nonetheless a disadvantage of choosing to play on GG Poker. More importantly though this discussion began with you claiming, that lots of people play the Battle Royal for profit. Which none of us know, because GG Poker keep results secret.
On other sites you can check on the Sharkscope leaderboard, what kind of ROI and monthly profit the best SnG players have, and what games they play. But not on GG Poker, so we dont actually know, if anyone is making money in that game long term, or how much. And I am kind of guessing, that the answer is no, because its a bad structure with high rake and a lottery element.