Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="John A, post: 2189346, member: 88730"] Correct. This was a little bit of a trick question overall though to see if you were going through the whole section. ;) What are some of the questions we want to ask? A few of these hands will be swayed slightly based on our opponents tendencies and/or stats. Yes. It's going to be difficult to get value out of this hand OOP, and too many reverse implied odd situations. Unless our opponent was a total post flop fish, we're folding almost always. This one is narrow, and mostly depends on our opponent. If they are pretty aggressive post flop, we're folding. If they are more passive, or generally not good post flop, we'd call. We can 3-bet JJ for value, but in most 6-max games you'd get much more value from calling and looking to play a mediumish pot. And clearly if you flop a set, it has a high propensity to be top set, and those rare spots where you're opponent flops or turns a set as well, they will usually have 2nd best set. I think 3-betting is your worse option here, and I talk about this a lot in terms of 3-betting SC's OOP. If you're 3-betting this OOP and you flop top pair, you're still going to be in a strange spot post flop, among other things. So calling/folding is going to mainly depend on stack size, and how good/bad our opponent is. If you're against a player that is pretty solid and aggressive, you'd want to fold this. Usually most players that are only opening 10% at 6-max won't fit into this category, but they could. At full ring, you'd want to make sure you're not against one of the better regs for your stakes. Yeah, you're dominating some of their range, and there are lots of post flop options. So flatting in general is the best option. Good job. So again, a little bit of a trick question, but if you run down the list of questions for this section, once you check off some of these, then they could become calls, 3-bets, etc... [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us