Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="braveslice, post: 3921387, member: 109200"]
Luls they are just fancy words, they don’t actually mean anything. You should know me already.

I just meant that compared to passive player pool at 2NL where any imaginable call play is possible at 5NL you find lots of more aggression. Now this aggression is usually aggression that hardly ever makes sense for logical mind, it’s easy to just generalize and say with top pair that hero has the winning hand and push it to the end. Even though concepts like pot control, trapping aggressive player, not betting too thinly on the river ie passive nuances of poker are starting to be also important. Protective bets are part of the poker, but not in any way close of being on the same importance with value bets. For example our hero has a habit of betting for protection to not give free cards, even though this is correct, no way is this something we should always do. We don't want to find our-self on the river with TPMK with huge pot (or even with TPTK) and then wonder what to do if the plan is not clear already from the flop.
  
UUh, so I was trying to say that our hero might be fighting solely with aggression with too little passive tools. And reason for this might be over adjusting because how only part of the pool play.

At the end this is meaningless given how good win rate he has, obviously he has just found a good way to make money. But smooth (I would call this balanced, but it’s probably wrong) strategy where every tool in the poker book (also passive tools) are in use that is not.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us