US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Polished Poker Vol. I Study Group
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 5965161, member: 393841"] If your goal with 4-betting is to get them to give up dominated hands, you need to be bigger for your 4-bet range. A larger proportional size will induce a greater amount of exploitive folds, when we have a tighter range image. On the contrary, when our perceived range is wider, the big 4-bet will achieve the polarization of both ranks (hero and villain). In this second case, it will be convenient to make a smaller size of 4-bet, because we will obtain little fold equity and we are not deep stack. The flop check line is reasonable. Another option is cbet 25% pot, but given our SPR there is no significant difference in these options. As played, the delayed continuation bet on the turn, indicates that you probably 4-bet preflop with hands like: Ax; Qx. With the size that you chosed you represent a heart blocker, as any other hand will look for a larger size, to make up for the bet not made on the flop. And any flush draw combo will now check on the turn, because by not betting on the flop, you want to hide your strength to induce bets from BTN who seem to want a lot of action, from preflop in this hand. On the river the Qh appears and when we check, we are representing the strongest part of our range. However, it is unlikely that the villain will believe this, as it is possible to perceive a blocker in us, but having a flush in our range is really a far cry, considering that the board eliminates most of the blockers of heart. In short, we represent the best hand with our river check line. So when the villain doesn't believe this, he knows that he must represent the top of his range when he decides to jam, because basically there are no sets in our range. And in this hand, the most expected is TT in the V range. Since BTN was able to float comfortably in the previous streets, because we did not print enough pressure. Because of how the sequence played out, I think without specific reads this is a fold on the river. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Polished Poker Vol. I Study Group
Top