T
TheBeard
Enthusiast
Silver Level
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Total posts
- 42
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
Hey guys what do you think is the softer field on 200NL, Pokerstars(ZOOM) or Full Tilt(Rush Poker)
tenbob
Legend
Silver Level
- Joined
- May 16, 2005
- Total posts
- 11,224
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 56
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #2
If you have to ask that question you are playing too high.
starting_at_the_bottom
Legend
Bronze Level
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2012
- Total posts
- 2,677
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 34
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #3
tenbob said:
Not really.
Even if i was crushing 200nl i would still be interested in moving to another site if the games were softer. In fact that is why i left my previous poker room - found softer games elsewhere.
vinylspiros
PIRANHA-------->< (((º>
Silver Level
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Total posts
- 4,393
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 7
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #4
i dont think 200 NL is soft anywhere.but i have almost zero experience in that limit. one things for sure.stars is probably the hardest site to play on.
bezobrazny
Legend
Silver Level
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Total posts
- 1,138
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #5
I played NL100 on PokerStars zoom and my experience is pretty good. You are able to take min 50 or max 100 bbs stack and I am telling you that because almost all other players which play there for a while have doubled or trippled their money so you are a bit handicaped but if you play smart, in a short period of time you can get advantage earning double stack. My honest advice is zoom on PokerStars.
vinylspiros
PIRANHA-------->< (((º>
Silver Level
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Total posts
- 4,393
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 7
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #6
i agree with this. i too have done quite well at times on 100NL o m on pokerstars,but i preffer the 50NL.its the limit that i feel the most comfortable playing. but zoom is the best format. love it.u can represent every flop in every hand and u can do it totally unnoticed.bezobrazny said: