Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="xexeu, post: 5844821, member: 314475"]
that occurs in this situation with you, is called variance. Negative variance (which was your case) means winning less times than expected with your AA.  Playing with this monster hand requires care.  It can make you profit in the short and long term.  The short in this case is the shovadas (allin), as it is the biggest possible pre-flop hand.  But if you don't feel safe and prefer to manage the game, the correct move is: raise 3x to 5 x the big blind (to scare away speculative hands and keep medium hands).

If there is a re-raise, you can only choose to call (but you must re-raise until allin goes).  If one or more players call, an analysis of the flop must be made (because it can be good or bad for you).  It would be a bad thing if a 89J or 567 appears on the flop. You will often be behind.  There may also be 3 cards of the same suit on the board and you do not have a match in your hand.  Both situations are bad for you.  Hands that offer two ends for the villain's straight or asked for a flush, are trouble bought for an AA who, if he was not potentially aggressive, will call with a risk of total loss (some will start with the threat, but there are many stubborn ones)

You don't necessarily have to send allin pre flop with AA.  But it is not 100% wrong to do it.  It is not advisable to do this in the bubble (close to a tournament payout).  Because it involves exit risk without having reached IMT (at the award).

Since you got this temporary trauma (will pass) from playing allin with AA, you should study correct or more guaranteed ways to play with him.  I'll take a look at the forum and find something to tell you.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us