US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
AC Poker Rooms, A sign of the times?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Big_Rudy, post: 1908156, member: 73333"] Actually, we're not all that far apart in our thinking. First off, yes, obviously different games/ different strategy/ different tactics. I DO dispute, however, that short-stackers cannot be successful while having a very limited understanding of the game. We've even had a few on here from time-to-time who were making considerable money and doing things like trying to make SNE on PS with a reasonable chance of actually making it. So some short-stackers can be, and are successful, while simply gutting much of the strategy from NL. Poker sites have realized this themselves and have, over time, increased the minimum buy-in amounts in many cases to try to remedy this situation. My bit about "understanding".... Yes I was referencing, specifically, math skills. I simply feel they are required more in any limited-betting type game, than they are in big bet poker. This difference, of course, is lessened as the stacks get deeper and deeper in NL. You reference, yourself, that SS can be successful, to a degree, because they "exploit the fact that many players at NL are not that strong mathematically". I agree. This was the crux of my arguement (at least that was my intent). It is possible to be a good, successful NL player and not be all that strong mathematically. Trying to achieve that at a limit game is suicide. Not to totally slag on NL. I actually enjoy the game. I simply feel it takes a different set of skills, and I, perhaps, incorrectly lumped limit and Nl together, under the banner "the game". Very roughly, and imo only, I think limit poker requires a better understanding of the game AS IT RELATES TO MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLES. Further, I think, NL requires a different skill set entirely eg. bluffing, reading the other players (not talking about hands here, but psychology, etc). So, yes, different games; different skill-sets. When I said that I felt limit required a better understanding of the game; I was thinking purely in terms of mathematical awareness of the situation during game-play. As far as nl, I would say that I think it takes a greater amount of skill in a broad range of non-math related abilities, intangibles, if you will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
AC Poker Rooms, A sign of the times?
Top