Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Dorkus Malorkus, post: 371625, member: 6020"]
I know I said I wouldn't respond, but making you look silly is too much fun, and I hate it when people think they have "won" just because anothe person sees arguing with someone so narrow-minded as useless.

Yes, HE is poker. So is 5-card draw, Stud, Omaha etc. One of a vast multitude of games is not comprehensive to poker as a whole. If a person can bake a cake, do they have a comprehensive knowledge of cookery? By your logic, it seems they do. I would suggest otherwise.

Dook already answered this. I suggest you abandon your usual style of picking one sentence from a post and blatantly ignoring the rest and try actually reading his post before rambling off-tangent like this any more.

I fail to see how posting the definition of "any" proves anything. Still you ignore the use of the words [b]ALL-AROUND[/b] (quite how many more times I need to bold/caps this I don't know). But your last sentence there obviously shows you are pathetically stubborn, and arguing with you appears to be the internet equivalent of banging my head against the corner of the table.

Look - good = good, all-around = comprehensive, poker = lots of games. I fail to see what is so difficult for you in putting these together. If someone is good at bluffing but doesn't know any other aspect of holdem, is he a good all-around holdem player? No, as bluffing is only one aspect of holdem, just as holdem is only one aspect of poker.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us