Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ats777, post: 1424303, member: 65636"]
^^ This is just about exactly what my reasoning was to start with limit.  In fact, I was going to use this "1 yr playing FL" time frame.  I knew that I had leaks in my game and had to work on the fundamentals, plus I had to get better at instantly calculating the math.  Even though, FL have simpler calculations, I do think its a great place to learn to do them quickly, just as MrSticker explained. My original goal was to spend this time learning the fundamentals, eliminating leaks, and learning do math quickly (well at least poker math). I also figured that if I made a mistake in FL, it would cost me a few big bets, whereas in NL, its gonna cost me a buy-in.  This has reinforced my original thinking.  I do agree though that if I eventually decide to go to NL, that I'm going to have to learn some new skill sets to succeed, but I think I need to spend time perfecting the basics first.  
 
Also, if someone wouldn't mind answering this question....when someone talks about "crushing" a game, what kind of win rate does this equate to?  4BB/100, 10BB?  I've often heard it mentioned but never defined.  Understand its partly subjective, just curious if there's a range or a range for what can be considered "solid" play.  Having a better sense on that would help as I progress up the levels.  I assume NL and FL have different standards for what is considered a solid win rate?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us