Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="joosebuck, post: 420385, member: 9185"]
This doesn't even make sense.  The A.I. would have to watch the players at a specific table for thousands of hands in order to be able to determine what players think what hands are strong enough to give action with.  Obviously AA/KK/AK, but from there it's all opinion.  I've seen one person play JJ completely different than another enough times to know that a computer that is able to determine what [B]my [/B]playstyle is along with [B]everyone else's [/B]at my table and adjust the cards we are getting accordingly (which is what this software would be doing, throwing out hands we wouldn't play aggressively, or at all) is impossible.  [B]Maybe[/B] one table.  [B]Maybe[/B] ten tables.  But to the scale that you see in online poker?  No.  It would be too ineffecient and costly to run the servers, especially since the rake is capped at most tables.

I want to quote something again in specific:

As random as it could possibly be (because there is no such thing as a random number generator) it wouldn't be boring.  There are a certain # of cards in the deck, and eventually AAAA will be beaten by a royal flush.  Possibly even 100 hands in a row.  Possibly not even in your lifetime.  For someone that claims to have as much experience in card theory, or at least live poker, you seem to be somewhat daft.

You have no argument, you have no evidence.

Did I leave anything out?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us