Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="GreekFish, post: 621451, member: 25309"] [b]Hellmouth(LOL) U SERIOUS?[/b] In reply to strom= Who do the pros say was the best no limit tourney player= stu ungar period. He beat them all doyle/ hellmouth/ huck. The final table in 80 was moss/ peason/ slim /doyle.. The size of the fields were not his fault HELLO, the fields in yrs will be 20 k and people will say well u only beat 8k, lol understand.. Hellmuth one a lot of the bracelets when The Pros boycotted the series in the 80's and 90's. Poker is not just holdem it s poker so the best overall is reese, pro at 16 diff games, ungar also won in stud and lowball, Hellmouth is a joke, ungar started the style that all of the great ones play on the internet as well/ raise and reraise with nothing/ so some guy on cardchat says hellmouth? ILL GO WITH THE PROS THEY ALL SAY STUEY BRUNSON CHIP DANIEL HUCK WHY DO THEY SAY THAT IS IT A CONSPIRACY, THE MOST FEARED TO DAY IS IVEY AND ANTONIUS LOOK AT THE PRO POLLS/ AND WHILE YOUR THERE LOOK AT THE PRO POLL FOR BEST NO LIMIT TOURNEY PLAYER HELLO= GUESS WHO=STUEY THE KID UNGAR/ BUY THE WAY TY HELLMOUTH CAUSE WHE HIM AND STU PLAYED THAT 97 SERIES HE FUSTRATED HELMOUTH SO MUCH TH DONKED OFF 375K TO HIM COULDNT HAVE DONE IT WITH OUT HIM, 11 BRACLETS HUGH PLENTY OF 100 MA FIELDS TOO, BUT THE PROS WERE BOYCOTTING AT THE TIME, WHAT A JOKE BOTTOM LINE UNGAR WAS A PHENOM/ JUST HAD ANOTHER SUPER HIGH STAKES CASH GAME IN LONDON ANTONIUS AND IVEY 800K POT/HELLMOUTH SCARED TO PLAY/LOST 30 K LOL/ THE FIRST ONE/THE GUY DOSENT HAVE THE BALLS TO PLAY THOSE STAKES/WHERE AS STU WELL HE WAS THE TRUE DEFINITION OF NO LIMIT/ BALLS(PUTTING A MAN TO THE ULTIMATE TEST................... [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us