Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Nathan Williams, post: 1865822, member: 83632"] Hey Big_Rudy, I will just answer some of your questions here. Regarding the study group I would be happy to help out but if there isn't enough interest then it won't start. Perhaps somebody should name a date like say next weekend and ask who is in. Get a count. I don't know how many people would be needed. Probably not more than a couple to get a decent discussion going. But it's up to you guys to start this thing. I'm not going to crack the whip here haha. 1) I have always preferred 6max and HU to be honest. I just played full ring in the past because it is easier to multi-table and collect rakeback and be a nit and auto pilot and all that. I think table selection is becoming an increasingly important part of online poker these days as well and it is hard to do so or even find enough quality tables sometimes if you are on 24. 2) In my experience the NL4 game on Merge plays closer to NL5 on Stars. 3) I wouldn't pay too much attention to those lobby numbers. I mean still go for the higher ones but all you need is one 40vpip whale to make a table good. Sometimes the nits at the micros are insanely nitty as well like a single digit vpip. This can really bring down the table average and make you think that there are no fish there. So I actually much prefer to micro-manage my table selection these days and look at individual players rather than look at table averages. Again, much easier to do when not playing 24 tables! In general I will open up my game a little bit more if I have a good seat at the table (i.e., the fish is on my right). But in general I don't really vary my game that much table to table. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us