Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Matt Vaughan, post: 2501388, member: 34747"] Well, nothing you said in your first post implied stake dependence, and typically, sites that are softer at their lower levels compared to other sites have similar differences as you move up. Not sure if you're just trying to sound superior by indicating your 400k+ hand database and the stakes you play, but it doesn't validate your statement - Bovada is MUCH softer than other sites. One of the huge reasons is because many regs stay away from it (partially for reasons you mentioned), and another is because fish love sports betting ldo. I found Bovada at the 100nl level to be quite comparable to something of a mix between 10nl and 25nl on Carbon. And I've still found tons of fish and not many particularly good regs at 200nl on Bovada. Others who have grinded Bovada as well as other US sites also attest to its softness - at all levels. I have no idea why you presume that it isn't softer than other sites. There isn't always quick turnover. I've sat on plenty of tables with at least 3 or 4 of the same players for 100+ hands, and often if I'm patient, 400+ hands on 2 or 3 of them. I think you vastly underestimate the value of a HUD in the 40-100 hand sample range. No, you obviously can't reliably look at their 3b stat after 40 hands, but being able to look at VPIP and PFR provides a ton of value that you wouldn't have if you were 4-tabling and just observing hands yourself. Maybe you're really good at watching every table simultaneously, but most people aren't. Many people will only be watching 1 hand at a time, or possibly only hands they are involved in, so the HUD has even more value. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us