Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jaketrevvor, post: 686137, member: 28780"] I think zach's point was based around the premise that if this was done regularly with so many people it would be far too obvious and they would get caught rather quickly, so the edges would indeed be much smaller than this as they cannot cheat to this extent. Zach I'm slightly confused by your post but let me just reread it and figure out why - it's to do with the period of time which the sample was taken, hold on let me reread it... okay: Yep, it totals to around 10k per annum at this rate (19 day sample, $500 profit). But this is, don't forget, a sample for 19 days not the whole year, so the bold is a strange statement... Plz tell me if I'm being an rtard and missing the whole thang (I am v. tired) [/QUOTE]