US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Controversial Floor Ruling - Do you agree?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 1642749, member: 23910"] A few things went wrong in this case. The dealer half-arsed the solution - either turn the hand face up for all to see and then award the pot accordingly because that's what the house rules require (the preferred action) or muck the hand without another word because the player has made their intention clear. You just don't second guess on whether the player has made a mistake or not because you end up putting yourself in idiotic situations like this one. Also, once other players have seen the cards they have an obligation to point out that a mistake is being made. That's a rule by the way, not just some vague matter of principle ([URL="http://www.homepokertourney.com/roberts-rules-of-poker.htm#THE_SHOWDOWN"]Roberts Rules Section 3 - General Poker Rules, The Showdown, Rule 3[/URL]) ...except what everyone chooses to ignore is that pretty much every version of the rules of poker you care to look at gives tournament directors and floor managers latitude to bend the technical rules in cases where it's in the interest of the game. Robert's Rules ([URL="http://www.homepokertourney.com/roberts-rules-of-poker.htm#DEAD_HANDS"]General Poker Rules, Dead Hands, Rule 2[/URL]) specifically allows for a hand to be retrieved from the muck if the cards are identifiable and it's in the interests of the game so the whole "mucked is mucked and that's the end of it" argument doesn't provide a complete solution. The question in this case is whether it's really in "the best interest of the game" to retrieve this hand. I'd say the floor got this one right since the player is the victim of nothing other than their own stupidity. They had all the relevant information available to them as well as the option of just turning their hand over and letting the dealer read the cards. 100% aviodable and 100% their fault - the dealer and other players just compounded the error after it was made. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Controversial Floor Ruling - Do you agree?
Top