Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="zachvac, post: 820648, member: 26306"] Then know that and take their entire stack when you hit your top pair, overpair, set, 2-pair, etc. First off, a good player is more likely to know that you bluff a lot and call you much lighter. Only difference is the good player will call with marginal hands rather than longshot draws. You'll be called down by middle pairs if you bluff that much. Wrong, this range right here: 22+,AJs+,KQs,AQo+,KQo, is 9.8% of all hands, meaning you'll get one of these once every 10 or so hands. If you're playing unbluffable players, here's how a typical round should go, note that at this rate you'll be playing about a hand per orbit, so you need to win 1.5 big blinds each hand for this to be profitable. I think each hand will win you at least that if played against fish. AA-JJ, just push preflop hard. Sets we obviously stack and overpairs we push hard. 22-TT, play for set value. We set ~1 in 8.5 flops, so we lose a big blind 7 of these so as long as we win 20+ each time we set we're fine. Assuming they are all donkeys we've already got ~3 more big blinds, so if we can only get paid another 17 big blinds when we set we win, and that should NOT be hard against donks with a preflop pot of 4 big blinds. With certain opponents that could be just one pot-sized flop bet with callers, and if we get called there donks are sure to call the turn as well. AJs+, AQo+, KQ we just play for top pair value. I think we flop pairs about 45%, and since some of these will not be top pair let's just say we only hit top pair 1 in 3 (heavy underestimation imo). We lose a big blind 2/3 of the time but the one time we hit as long as we win 6.5 big blinds when we have top pair, easy against donks, we win. In fact, if we just win ~25 for sets, ~10 for top pair hands, and 4 for over pair type hands, this will give us close to a 10 PTBB/100 hands winrate, something I can only wish I could get (I'm at ~2 at 100nl and the best players ever I've seen are at like 5-7 at the mid to higher limits). [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us