US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Deciding a winner
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="GoochyPKR, post: 828953, member: 41895"] Hey Guys Quick question thats been bothering me and a few friends for a few days. If in a game, 3 handed, the chip leader beats both of the two remaining players in one hand, who between the two remaining players who have been eliminated finishes second? As this is a cash game, my theory would be that the person who had the best hand would finish second as this would have beaten the person who had more chips but a worse hand. However, if it was a league game for points then the person with the most chips would finish second because they have a higher chip count and would have been able to cover the player even though he had the better hand. For example- in the game im referring too. The Chip Leader had Ace Three of Spades, The Middle Stack had Jack King Off Suit and the Short Stack had Pocket Aces. After a round of betting, the flop came Jack, King, Three. So at present, the middle stack was winning. The next card came another three, then both the middle stack and the short stack went all in, which the chip leader called. The final card was a dead card (4) which meant that the chip leader won with three of a kind of three's..... now the middle stack only had a short amount more than the short stack. Who finishes Second? Any thoughts on this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Deciding a winner
Top