Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="xXSmuggla, post: 1488977, member: 62527"]
My original intent was not to argue about the definition of collusion.  Most of us understand what constitutes cheating for profit.  However, to a Full Tilt Moderator, the actions that the OP and coach did can be called into question.  This is why I was simply trying to warn the OP about the possible dangers of him playing with his coach.  The last thing I want is for the OP to lose his bankroll bc he was playing with his coach (And the first thing Full Tilt wants [I]is[/I] his bankroll (Free profit)).  There have been many instances in which friends play with friends etc.  They can say that they are not playing any differently towards each other, but I believe it is still a subtle act of collusion.  I also agree with scooby doo (relpraggy), that the fact is that the coach is making money either way somewhat unfairly (By bluffing his student to win pots, or by laying down to his students bet so he comes back for another coaching session).  So is it "Collusion"? No, not by definiton from Full Tilt's policy.  However, there are unfair advantages in this situation, and Full Tilt won't hesitate to take someones bankroll for free.  I'm really not trying to start any shit, my original point was to warn Boston (The OP) of what could happen.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us