Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dj11, post: 2254203, member: 13851"]
I have tried to respond to this several times, and failed.

My notion has to do with the frequency of PF PP's.  Approximately 1 in 17 hands are PF PP's, 1 in 13 of those will be AA.

You will suffer those odds personally, but each hand (all players) will also suffer those same odds but on a group level.  So, the frequency of PF PP at a 6 max table will be less than at fuller tables.  Once every 3 hands (approx) in 6 max will have someone with a PF PP.  That increases to a bit better than once every 2 hands for 9 or 10 seat tables.

This is where I have failed;  While it is obvious that starting hands are more likely better at fuller tables, I'm not sure how to describe how to take the argument further.  The difference is something close to 40% fewer better hands at 6 max.  But it seems likely that between 9 and 10 seat tables we should tighten up 11% at 10 seat tables.  So if, on average, your VPIP at 9 seat tables is 16%, it should be 14 or 15% at 10 seat tables.

Depending on the looseness factor of a table your AF should probably increase at the bigger tables as you will need to bet bigger to iso more.

The simple answer of MP at a 9max or 10 max table being equivalent to UTG at 6 max doesn't offer us much really useful info other than we should probably be playing position more in 6 max than 10 max.

You can see why I have failed at describing this notion several times.

Somebody fix me please!:eek:
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us