US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Do you like Today's coverage of the WSOP better than years back?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ThunderPT, post: 1546526, member: 67716"] I'm already surprised they're now talking about position using terms like UTG+1. Even some journalists of poker press didn't use those acronyms because they were afraid a big percentage of their audience wouldn't know what they meant. So, I think ESPN wants to introduce these things that would interest us, but they have to do it slowly so the casual fans aren't overwhelmed. These year they introduced position, soon everyone will be know what the hijack seat is and then they introduce something else. It's like ESPN is educating the casual fans. One thing I really don't like is that bull segment where Norman Chad tries to read a player's hand. That's an awesome concept when you have someone who knows what he's doing on the microphone. What Chad does is ridiculous. Instead of putting a player on a range of hands and then narrow it down as the action takes place, he puts a player on a specific hand after his first action pre-flop and then assumes that's the hand the player has throughout the hand, even after it's clearly obvious by his actions that he couldn't have that hand. He even goes as far as criticizing the way the player is playing the hand he "supposedly" has. That's just stupid and the whole idea seems pointless if that's the way they're going to do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Do you like Today's coverage of the WSOP better than years back?
Top