Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bremp555, post: 7235396, member: 400983"] Honestly, I think solvers are great tools, but only when players actually understand why a certain line is taken. When people just copy solver outputs without context, it can look pretty weird at the table: random overbets, strange check-raises, or “balanced” bluffs in spots where the population never folds. It creates this illusion of high-level play, but many times it's just misapplied theory. For the average player, I feel solvers help if they’re used to understand concepts like ranges, frequencies, and board textures. But if someone tries to play perfect GTO without knowing the ideas behind it, it can honestly cause more harm than good. In soft fields, simple, solid poker usually prints more than trying to be a solver robot. Curious to see how others feel about this. [/QUOTE]