Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Houbi37, post: 7235489, member: 467193"] I completely agree with this. Solvers are amazing for learning the underlying principles of good poker, but when players copy the outputs without understanding the [I]why[/I], it really shows. You end up seeing bizarre overbets, awkward check-raises, or bluffs in spots where the entire pool basically never folds. It looks “GTO,” but it’s really just misapplied theory. For most players, solvers are valuable when they help build a better understanding of ranges, frequencies, and how different board textures interact with different hands. But trying to play perfect solver poker in soft games often backfires. At lower stakes, simple fundamentals and clear exploitative adjustments usually make way more money than trying to imitate a solver with mixed strategies. Definitely interested to hear other opinions on this — it’s a hot topic nowadays. [/QUOTE]