Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="spectralwave, post: 6039079, member: 421600"] When making decisions, individuals are constantly receiving and sending information. This information is processed, according to Kahneman, by two systems. • System I can be understood as the fast, automatic system, with little or no effort and no perception of voluntary control. • System II allocates attention to the laborious mental activities that require, including complex calculations. The operations of System II are often associated with the subjective experience of activity, choice and concentration, points out that System I is responsible for reading the simple things, which belongs to the common world that we have in our impressions. When System I works with difficulty, that is, some type of more complex problem, it is necessary for System II to interfere and process the information with more focus. In short, most of what an individual thinks and does originates from his System I, but System II takes control when things get tough. System I doesn't keep up with the alternatives he rejects, not even the fact that there were alternatives. Conscious doubt is not in System I's repertoire; it requires maintaining incompatible interpretations in the mind at the same time, which requires mental effort. Uncertainty and doubt are the domain of the System Therefore, System I is impulsive and intuitive. System II is capable of reasoning and cautious, but it also has the disadvantage of being lazy. Apparently, it is necessary to employ moderate mental effort for System II to function properly. This condition opens loopholes for bias to occur, classified as a lazy failure in System II. To explain the bias that can occur in System I and II, it adopted the that's all there is. Therefore, our systems tend to accept with cognitive comfort statements as true that often go through biases of judgments and choices. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us