Downswing or am I doing someting wrong??

pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #1
Hi,

The two picture below are my PT3 stats for two periods. First up to Dec 09 and secondly from Dec 09 to now. As you can see the results are very different but the stats (as far as I can see) are much the same. Is this just a downswing or am I doing something wrong? Was I jus luck pre December and it's catching up with me? I'd be grateful of any pointers! Thanks guys.

PS this is for 2NL full ring cash games
 

Attachments

  • Details 1.jpg
    Details 1.jpg
    141.9 KB · Views: 137
  • Details.jpg
    Details.jpg
    142.9 KB · Views: 135
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #2
Small sample size makes it impossible to tell but for FR I'd say you're playing too loose and not raising enough preflop. Eliminate a lot of the junk you're limping with or that you're playing from EP. Preflop stats more like 14/12 would be closer to optimal.
 
BelgoSuisse

BelgoSuisse

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Total posts
9,218
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #3
I agree with WVH.

tiny sample sizes so monetary results are irrelevant.

It's probably possible to beat 2nl playing 19/10, but you should tighten up and reduce the vpip/pfr gap. Stop limping. For more, we'd need to see actual hands instead of stats.
 
cjatud2012

cjatud2012

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Total posts
3,904
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #4
I'd be interested to see your profits by position-- I know that I'm profitable in each position except the blinds, where it's not even close... So maybe you're like me and need to cut down on completing from the SB or getting over-involved from BB.

Otherwise, we're looking at ~3700 hands, a lot of this can just be variance. Just follow WV's advice and your game will most likely improve.
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #5
Thanks guys - yep I'm currently playing at 19/9 so agree this an area that i need to tighten up on.

As for positions I'm currently making money in all positions except BB, SB and UTG.

I play 24/12 on the button and more worryingly 15/4 UTG and 35/15 in the SB...seroius leaks?
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #6
UTG should be something more like 9/9 or 10/10 imo. Just cut out all open limping.

Tighten up in the SB. It's the worst position on the table. Why pay for something you shouldn't want for free?
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #7
WVHillbilly said:
UTG should be something more like 9/9 or 10/10 imo. Just cut out all open limping.

Tighten up in the SB. It's the worst position on the table. Why pay for something you shouldn't want for free?

Thanks for your input WVH - it's been most useful
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #8
Try and get your stats more like 19/17, 15/13, 18/15 etc
There shouldn't be a big gap between your Vpip and PFR. Stop open limping and heck even make limping behind a rare occurrence.
 
tpb221

tpb221

Chasing Gutshots
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Total posts
2,095
Awards
1
Poker Chips
9
Casino Coins
0
  • #9
No open limping from UTG. No-no open limping period. Your w$sd is very low. Taking to many hands to far.
 
Double-A

Double-A

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Total posts
787
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #10
WVHillbilly said:
Tighten up in the SB. It's the worst position on the table. Why pay for something you shouldn't want for free?

^^^^^^ This is word.

Also, it looks like you're calling more turn/river raises. I'm curious if those particular hands don't represent the majority of your down swing...
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #11
Double-A said:
^^^^^^ This is word.

Also, it looks like you're calling more turn/river raises. I'm curious if those particular hands don't represent the majority of your down swing...

Thanks Double A...where do I see this stat on the summary page. Apologies, I'm new to analysing PT3 in great detail.

Thanks too to all the other comments..yes, open limping is a curse I need to shift..
 
Double-A

Double-A

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Total posts
787
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #12
pokerman27 said:
Thanks Double A...where do I see this stat on the summary page. Apologies, I'm new to analysing PT3 in great detail.

No worries. Look for "folded to a turn raise" in the upper right.

I should have said, that it looks like you are folding to turn/river raises less.

Small sample but, it could be that your are continuing to showdown too often in the face of resistance on the turn/river. That could be why your "won money @ showdown %" looks low.

Again, I wouldn't be surprised if your downswing wasn't from a few key hands where you called down big turn/river bets.
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #13
Double-A said:
No worries. Look for "folded to a turn raise" in the upper right.

I should have said, that it looks like you are folding to turn/river raises less.

Small sample but, it could be that your are continuing to showdown too often in the face of resistance on the turn/river. That could be why your "won money @ showdown %" looks low.

Again, I wouldn't be surprised if your downswing wasn't from a few key hands where you called down big turn/river bets.

Okay great thanks...so I should consider folding more often in the face of a turn/river raise. Think this could be a new leak I need to plug.
 
L

LukeSilver

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Total posts
481
Awards
1
Poker Chips
36
Casino Coins
0
  • #14
if your on a table with a lot of limping and multi way pots though limping in early position with small pairs is not a mistake if you can score big when you hit sets.

On a tight aggressive table where someone will raise and isolate you then force you to play out of position I wouldn't recommend limping UTG with small pairs but on a loose passive table against people who will over play top pair this can be very profitable.

assess the table situations.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #15
LukeSilver said:
if your on a table with a lot of limping and multi way pots though limping in early position with small pairs is not a mistake if you can score big when you hit sets.

On a tight aggressive table where someone will raise and isolate you then force you to play out of position I wouldn't recommend limping UTG with small pairs but on a loose passive table against people who will over play top pair this can be very profitable.

assess the table situations.

I agree it can be profitable but I believe it's more profitable to raise them or fold them from EP. I personally fold 22-77 from UTG/UTG+1 and open raise all other pps. From MP1 on I open all pps. Not saying you can't do something else and make money but for me 22-77 were losers over a fairly large sample from EP.
 
LuckyChippy

LuckyChippy

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Total posts
4,987
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #16
I play 6-max so you have to adjust it but 6-max UTG I straight fold pp's less than 77. That's MP1 FR I think. I'd probs do the same MP1 (6-max) then drop it to 55/66 MP2. Then i'd open them all in CO/Button.

Just an example of how tight you should be with them really though mine might be a little too tight. (Not the UTG that is just a rule 77+)

On the other hand if a tight UTG raises then i'm calling with all of my pp's from pretty much any positon. I hate it in the SB but I still would.

Playing pp's is fairly simple, though they MUST be played right or it's a big money loser.
 
Double-A

Double-A

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Total posts
787
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #17
pokerman27 said:
Okay great thanks...so I should consider folding more often in the face of a turn/river raise. Think this could be a new leak I need to plug.

I don't know but it might be worth looking into.

I wouldn't want to say "fold more". I'd say, "raise OR fold more".

Most of my "down swings", that were big enough to look into, were really just one or two bad sessions with one or two REALLY bad hands. Most of those bad hands had glaring mistakes in them. Like calling huge turn/river raises with mediocre holdings...
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #18
LuckyChippy said:
I play 6-max so you have to adjust it but 6-max UTG I straight fold pp's less than 77.

ewww
 
S93

S93

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Total posts
6,154
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #19
6a00d83451e1dc69e2010536ba71c3970b-800wi
LuckyChippy said:
I play 6-max so you have to adjust it but 6-max UTG I straight fold pp's less than 77.
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #20
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #21
pokerman27 said:
You saying that's too tight?

That photo is so cool.
I'm gunna use it in the hand analysis section rather than give advise :p

and ye at 6max u shud always be opening your pocketpairs regardless of position.
 
Top