US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Doyle Brunson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 3887891, member: 23910"] I agree to a certain extent - there can certainly be value in reading all sorts of texts, even ones that are outdated, to gain a broader perspective on an issue or to understand how people thought at a certain time. That said, for it to be valuable I think you already need to have a solid understanding of the topic at hand: you need to [b]know[/b] that you're reading something that's outdated or has been superseded, and have an understanding of how it does or doesn't apply to the issue at hand. Now like you, it's been some years since I last read the original [i]Super System[/i] too. It's absolutely an interesting read. But it has little if any relevance to the modern game. For starters, it dedicates large sections to games that are almost [b]never[/b] played any more, including traditional five-card draw and high-low stud with no qualifier (which is significantly different strategically from the Stud8 variant that's most commonly played today). It also doesn't cover what's probably the second-most popular game today, PLO (though the sequel does IIRC) Point is though, chances are if you're on this forum then the game you're most interested in is NLHE, played online for relatively low stakes. The NLHE section of the original [i]Super System[/i], on the other hand, is concerned almost exclusively with playing live NLHE games, against relatively unsophisticated opponents, for high stakes. In fact the sheer amounts of money often at stake are mentioned by Brunson a few times as being an integral part of his strategy when it comes to putting pressure on his opponents. Now if you, in 2017, have access to that kind of game with those kind of opponents then that's fantastic. But if you don't, and you try to apply that same strategy to a low-stakes online game, chances are you're going to get crushed. So... is it an "interesting" read? Sure. But if you're someone with limited time and money looking to improve your low-stakes online NLHE game, then I'm suggesting there are plenty of better ways you can spend your time. Maybe this latest book is more relevant to the modern game - I don't know, I haven't read it. But unless you're a mixed game player you'll still be shelling out for a book you only really want one section of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Doyle Brunson
Top