Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="zachvac, post: 1044248, member: 26306"]
umm what? Look at this again: [url]http://www.pokertableratings.com/overview/durrrr[/url]

umm no offense, but I'm pretty sure you don't understand what playing well/poorly is at that level. I'll take that back if you've played at railhaven before or even only like $100/$200 or so.

Look at the tableratings page again. Look at durrrr's second best friend (ie won the second most money from). That's right, ziigmund. In fact he's almost down a million. [url]http://www.pokertableratings.com/overview/Ziigmund[/url]

So if by wins just as much you mean loses 1 million while durrr has won over 6M, then yeah he's won as much.

I really doubt that, at least today. The WSOP ME especially has thousands and thousands of entrants. Even the best player in the entire world would probably only cash once in a thousand at BEST. Harrington described big tournaments as lotteries where the better players and pros get more tickets. So you're saying they'd rather be remembered as winning a lottery than winning in cash games against the best players around? Yeah, sure.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us