Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="K_Kahne_Fan, post: 760977, member: 27510"]
When I have stack larger than another player I will typically bet their stack size. Is that frowned upon, or does it not matter one way or another? When I'm short stacked and the large stack pushes all their chips it always seems a little overkill to me. Here's an example hand...
 
PokerStars Game #16409670860: Tournament #83093112, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2008/04/01 - 11:42:40 (ET)
Table '83093112 1' 10-max Seat #9 is the button
[COLOR=red][B]Seat 3: 09kKahneFan (10325 in chips)[/B][/COLOR] 
[COLOR=red][B]Seat 8: BzZRain (1695 in chips) [/B][/COLOR]
Seat 9: jannebc (2980 in chips) 
09kKahneFan: posts the ante 25
BzZRain: posts the ante 25
jannebc: posts the ante 25
09kKahneFan: posts small blind 200
BzZRain: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to 09kKahneFan [:ad: :qs:]
jannebc: folds 
[B][COLOR=red]09kKahneFan: raises 1270 to 1670 (should've been 1695, but close enough)[/COLOR][/B]
BzZRain: folds 
09kKahneFan collected 875 from pot
09kKahneFan: doesn't show hand 
 
 
Should I put in like $2K here since it would cover him, or was the (almost) stack size bet ok? Either way it puts them all in, I just don't want to look like a jerk when I do so.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us