US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Face the Ace: Could the amateurs have the advantage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JulieK, post: 1258698, member: 56533"] I've been thinking about this all day. I think a talanted amatuer, who got through all that qualifying, and who regularly watches Poker After Dark, should be a favorite over those pros. Mainly because he's seen hours and hours of them playing on TV, and they don't know squat about him. But also because the amateur has to be hard to get any tells from. The amateur is going to be scared and nervous just from being in that situation, and that's the only read you can get from him. All-in with AK or AA or 68, he's going to be just as scared just to be on TV playing for all that money. Plus, the pros playing for charity, are likely to not be playing at the same level as if they had money on the line. I will admit, that if a guy is going for a third win, and the pros have seen him play twice - and the initial nervousness of the situation has died down - maybe the pros would be at an advantage. But I really think that in the first match, the amateur should be a significant favorite to win; and a slight favorite in the second match. I think, if they used low-level pros, who you don't see on TV, the pros would cream the amateurs. But, as long as it's the big-name FTilt pros who we see all the time, the amateurs are going to get the best of it. From a promotional standpoint, FTilt and pro players probably stand to gain more, the better the amateurs do. If the amateurs do well on TV, that advertises the idea that talented amateurs can win on FTilt or in Vegas; and increases the money to be made by FTilt as a site, and pro players in general. It's not as if it costs FTilt $1 million if the amateur wins and gets paid, because they have sold alot of the advertising to recoup some of that, and they are getting more play on the site from advertising in Prime Time. I'm not going to say that the pros are motivated to roll over and throw the matches, because that's more profitable in the long run - but I will say that has to be a possibility to consider. I'm curious to know if there is a Vegas line on these matches. If there is not, that might be an indicator that the pros are not really trying to win. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Face the Ace: Could the amateurs have the advantage
Top