US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
First session of 50 NL - thoughts on these hands?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="viking999, post: 852463, member: 5897"] FWIW, I would never fold #1. He doesn't have enough behind to kill your odds. If he can have KJ there, he can have KQ. He could also have AK for a chop or AsQs for a slight edge in your favor. KJ and JJ are possible but less likely, and given the crazy good pot odds, you can't just assume you're beat. I'd say you have somewhere around a 40-45% share of that pot against his range (I'm not giving it an even probability distribution, mind you), and the pot odds absolutely make that a call. Edit: I say KJ and JJ are less likely than KQ or AK mainly because of statistics. Players more often have medium strength hands than big hands because more cards have to come out just right to hit a big hand. Also, the KJ is less likely because it is the weakest hand I listed, and he cold called a preflop 3-bet. Can't rule it out, but I'm just saying it's rarer. I agree with the mob on #2. On hand #3, I'm trying to get big action on the flop. I like the check/raise line, because the preflop raiser has yet to act, and that's a likely flop for him to have hit a medium strength hand (one pair or a straight draw). I hope that was your intent. I wouldn't check/call there ever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
First session of 50 NL - thoughts on these hands?
Top