Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="detroitjunkie, post: 2806024, member: 61462"] Half of all poker rules are anti-collusion and anti-angling. Player B's move falls into both categories here. Remember, this doe not mean B is colluding or angling but just the same the rules exist. Several apply - one person per hand, throwing cards at a players hand, the move could be considered a muck technically to stop angles. So its not to penalize his behavior, but most people who play like arrogant f-heads are colluding and angling so the two usually go hand in hand (not to behavior profile). I would not be surprised in this situation to see player B say, upon A turning his cards over and seeing that player B lost, "hey those were not my cards, he must have switched them' - Ive seen worse, and the above mentioned rules are to stop this from happening. The fact that his behavior is poor makes it just more fun. [/QUOTE]