Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="paulw, post: 4760853, member: 351435"]
I have the full version of  HM2,

the trial 30 day version of PT4

and the trial 30 day version of Jivaro

First Jivaro looks good on the table, and its by far the easiest to set up, and it does give you the basic stats that changes auto by position, I would say this would be ideal for a beginner, or a fun player, or for that matter any player good enough to play without the use or choice of many other stats, off table its no where near as good as HM2 and PT4 IMO

PT4 first impressions it looks like a cheaper version of HM2,  but after 2 weeks of getting used to it this seems to be as good if not better than HM2, behind the scenes, all hands and games played seemed to be much more organised than HM2 its got a built in leak buster that easy to use and works well, IMO.

HM2 I have owned Holdem Manager for a few years now, I know my way around it much more than I know PT4, I think the HUDs in HM2 are much better, I like HM2 replayer much better, I like the choice and ease of making HUDs in HM2 better, to me it seems a much better quality software program compared to PT4, but that said,I am not fully used to PT4  and I would think it has a lot, more to offer off table

To sum it up if I find something that works I wont change, but if I did it would be to PT4.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us