Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="neptun1914, post: 4763897, member: 314327"] I am using holdem manager since several months and it is very useful program. I am using primarily the HM3 Beta as i like to test new softwares and while it has some bugs (as expected for beta) the new graphical HUD looks much similar to Jivaro which i like and the replay manager is really good. Also the HM3 beta is much faster than the HM2 and do not need postgre anymore. Generally hud is helpful tool as it allows fast and easy collection of statistics for other players. Many people that don't use hud think that this is program which tells people how to play and gives unfair advantage to people who can pay for it but this is very wrong. What HUD does is to just read the hand history saved by your poker client, summarize it and show statistics based on it for the players with which you play on the table. Nothing more than that. Of course you can take notes the old fashioned way but when we have the processing power of today's computers then why not use it to save some time. For me the possibility to return to a hand that i played later and analyze it is also very good feature improving my game. So to sum it up - for me HM is good program and it deserves its price because i consider it a tool which i will use for years to constantly improve my game. I personally prefer the option to pay once for a program 100$ for example than to give few dollars but regularly every month. I also recommend everybody who is still thinking if playing with HUD is good idea or not to try a free hud first (like easy poker hud for example) and if you like it you can always in something with more features like HM, PT4 or something else. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us