Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dj11, post: 676785, member: 13851"] Thinking about this practically, and seemingly verified via observation, I think that each processor is only running one game at a time. With todays faster processors it is possible that they each could easily handle more games, but from a maintenance POV, along with memory and storage use, one game per processor is fine. In the big scheme of things this would be efficient as processors are fairly cheap these days. But then you, as a bean counter, might start thinking about profit per processor per hour, and if they let the bean counters run it then the OP could come into play. God forbid the bean counters. Good example of why? The girl whose insurance refused to pay for a transplant until one hour before she died for lack of transplant. IMO bean counters should stick to counting beans else the rest of us might think they should be counting beans from the root side of the plant! [/QUOTE]