Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="zachvac, post: 722128, member: 26306"]
I've definitely thought about doing this (especially when you suggested it ;)), but here's my thought process. Basically if I play 12 tables and win at 3 BB/100 it's equivalent to playing 6 tables and winning at 6 BB/100. If I can get my game to the point where I'm winning at 4-5 BB/100 then I think we'd both agree I should stick with 12-tabling. I don't know if this is possible, but I'm going to find out. If this doesn't work out I'll definitely scale back, and if/when I do move up to 50nl there's no way I'll be starting it 12-tabling, I'll probably start with 4 or maybe 6. 12-tabling right after moving up stakes would be suicide.

As for today, played 1063 hands, won $53.65 for a winrate of 10.09 BB/100. Now this means nothing because I ran well, there's no way I'm keeping that up (did have KK run into AA, but villain had about $6 in his stack to start the hand). But first off I have about $10 of non-showdown winnings and I felt I was playing pretty good poker. Gonna play some more but it's going well so far.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us