US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Handicapped People's Civil Rights To Play Poker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 1736425, member: 23910"] Two things. First of all, as I've stated before, for you to win at online poker someone else has to lose money. You [B]are[/B] hurting someone else by playing online poker and it's pretty freaking direct too. Never forget that. Second, while I applaud the effort to improve freedoms across the board, I suspect that this isn't a problem with one universal solution and that each issue will have to be argued individually, on its own merits. The arguments for legalising gay marriage and online poker are very different, for example, and I really can't see a blanket campaign that's going to work for both issues - ignoring the fact that any such campaign would have to be so broad in scope that it would essentially lose all meaning. Absolutely positively 100% correct. That doesn't help us though because as we've pointed out above opponents of online poker will argue that legalising online poker will result in [B]more[/B] problem gambling as a result of the ease of access. The problem gamblers that already exist will still be problem gamblers but what happens when, say, a few million Zynga Poker players move over to a real money site, get addicted and lose loads of money? Those are brand new problem gamblers that we wouldn't have had if we hadn't have legalised online poker. Personally, in anticipation of that argument, I'd respond that regulation would be able to enforce protections for [B]all[/B] problem gamblers, new and old alike. In the current environment there really aren't any problem gambling protections built into online poker, at least not effective ones - in fact, the current laws force the sites to advertise their services as "fun and risk free" which is clearly misleading. Problem gamblers gonna gamble, we may as well regulate to provide protections and derive revenue, some of which can be put towards support services for them and society at large. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Handicapped People's Civil Rights To Play Poker
Top