US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Handicapped People's Civil Rights To Play Poker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Charade You Are, post: 1736748, member: 39511"] I agree with what I think is your overall argument that logic and emotion is going to have no effect on whether we regain the ability to play poker where we want. It's going to take the casinos getting enough backing to get a law passed where they have the edge (which the DOJ just gave them by effectively shutting down the 3 biggest sites to US players). So I will never get what I want, which is my FTP back. Those are certainly reasonable. FYI my great-grandfather was a gambling addict. He never logged on to the internet, and had enough self-control to pay his bills first. The only time he lost all his money was in the stock market crash of 1929. A number of my family members are alcoholics. Most were able to stop drinking eventually, some sooner than later. The ones that stopped sooner had family that didn't enable them, made them take responsiblity for their actions (i.e. didn't bail them out of jail when they were caught DUI, didn't drive them around when they lost their license, eg). The ones that stopped much later had family that enabled them, bailed them out, hid the problem and generally felt sorry for them. So I don't think my view of addiction is naive at all. So emotional arguements only work on their side? If you think congress weighs the greater good in making their decisions, you are the one that is naive. In a country where gambling is NOT illegal, it's obvious government could care less about the "poor smuck" or his kid. It's just the argument the right uses to get the uninformed on their side. I have yet to hear anyone arguing that the old lady down the street shouldn't be allowed to spend her entire social security check on lottery tickets. You have a point there, but if the concern is actually for the gambler, then I would think that including poker with an online casino would be much more dangerous for gamblers than poker alone. I don't have numbers, but I would guess the % of gambling addicts that would play only poker is small versus the % that would play other games. Yet every attempt to legalize gambling in the US favors casinos. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Handicapped People's Civil Rights To Play Poker
Top