US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Harrington on Hold'em Vol. 1 discussion: Part 4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ChuckTs, post: 424304, member: 467"] Implied odds are simple, medeiros, I think the hard thing about them is estimation. Say you're drawing and are getting slightly unfavourable odds. Not a great situation, but considering your opponent is a going to call a bet that will make up for those bad odds if you hit your draw, then your call is acceptable. Here was an example from the book: you have [COLOR=black]Q♣[COLOR=black]9♣[/COLOR] and the board shows [COLOR=black] A♣[/COLOR][COLOR=black]K♣[/COLOR][COLOR=red]7♦[/COLOR][COLOR=red]6♥[/COLOR] You estimate that your opponent has you beat with aces or kings, and with both of you having 3000 in front of you and the pot at 1000, your opponent bets 500. Your getting 1500:500 or 3:1, which are slightly unfavourable. Whatever bet you think you can get out of your opponent on the river you should add to the current pot size (1500) to see if it would give you favourable odds. So here, you'd need to get a bet of at least 550 to make the implied odds 4.11:1, which are favourable to you. (1500+X)/500=4.11 1500+X=2055 X=550 Hard to do quickly in your head, but basically you know that if the pot were 2000, then his 500 bet would be giving you 4:1, so you'd need a little more than a 500 chip bet on the river to compensate. The hard thing about implied odds is estimating how much your opponent will call. That part's pretty much all guesswork. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Harrington on Hold'em Vol. 1 discussion: Part 4
Top